🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are investing enormous sums into what is known as “sovereign AI” – developing domestic AI models. From Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, nations are racing to develop AI that understands local languages and cultural nuances.

The International AI Competition

This initiative is an element in a wider global competition spearheaded by large firms from the US and the People's Republic of China. Whereas companies like a leading AI firm and a social media giant invest substantial funds, mid-sized nations are likewise making sovereign gambles in the artificial intelligence domain.

However with such tremendous amounts at stake, is it possible for smaller states attain significant benefits? As noted by a specialist from a prominent thinktank, Except if you’re a rich nation or a major company, it’s quite a hardship to create an LLM from the ground up.”

Security Issues

A lot of countries are reluctant to rely on overseas AI models. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, as an example, Western-developed AI tools have at times been insufficient. A particular example saw an AI agent employed to instruct learners in a distant area – it communicated in English with a pronounced US accent that was difficult to follow for native users.

Then there’s the national security aspect. For the Indian defence ministry, employing particular international AI tools is viewed unacceptable. According to a developer explained, It's possible it contains some arbitrary training dataset that could claim that, oh, a certain region is separate from India … Using that certain system in a defence setup is a major risk.”

He continued, I’ve consulted experts who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, setting aside particular tools, they are reluctant to rely on Western systems because information could travel abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Domestic Projects

In response, several states are funding domestic projects. An example this initiative is being developed in India, where a firm is striving to create a national LLM with public funding. This initiative has committed approximately $1.25bn to artificial intelligence advancement.

The developer envisions a system that is significantly smaller than premier models from US and Chinese tech companies. He notes that the nation will have to make up for the funding gap with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the advantage of allocating huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete versus such as the hundreds of billions that the America is devoting? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the brain game comes in.”

Native Emphasis

Across Singapore, a public project is funding machine learning tools educated in south-east Asia’s local dialects. These particular languages – including Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and more – are often poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

I hope the experts who are creating these independent AI models were conscious of just how far and the speed at which the cutting edge is moving.

A leader engaged in the initiative notes that these systems are intended to supplement larger models, instead of replacing them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he comments, commonly have difficulty with local dialects and cultural aspects – interacting in unnatural Khmer, for example, or recommending pork-based meals to Malay consumers.

Creating native-tongue LLMs enables state agencies to include cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful technology built overseas.

He continues, “I’m very careful with the word sovereign. I think what we’re attempting to express is we wish to be more adequately included and we want to understand the abilities” of AI systems.

International Partnership

Regarding nations seeking to find their place in an growing international arena, there’s an alternative: collaborate. Researchers affiliated with a well-known institution recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a group of middle-income nations.

They call the initiative “Airbus for AI”, modeled after Europe’s successful play to create a competitor to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would involve the creation of a public AI company that would combine the resources of several states’ AI programs – for example the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to develop a viable alternative to the US and Chinese major players.

The main proponent of a study describing the proposal notes that the idea has attracted the attention of AI leaders of at least three nations to date, along with several state AI organizations. Although it is currently centered on “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have additionally indicated willingness.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s simply reality there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of the present American government. Experts are questioning like, is it safe to rely on these technologies? What if they choose to